<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T-Mobile faces class action suit &#8212; contract &#8220;unconscionable&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/t-mobile/t-mobile-faces-class-action-suit-contract-unconscionable-34617/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/t-mobile/t-mobile-faces-class-action-suit-contract-unconscionable-34617/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: PEG</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/t-mobile/t-mobile-faces-class-action-suit-contract-unconscionable-34617/comment-page-1/#comment-98869</link>
		<dc:creator>PEG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/t-mobile/t-mobile-faces-class-action-suit-contract-unconscionable-34617/#comment-98869</guid>
		<description>T-MOBILE HAS BEEN OVER CHARGING ME FOR MONTHS.  EACH TIME I’D CONTACT THEM ABOUT THE OVERSIZED BILL  T- MOBILE WOULD CONSECUTIVELY  RECOMMEND A NEW PLAN. IT NEVER WORKED. December 24, 2008, MY CELL PHONE BILL BEGAN AT $55.00 @ MONTH .  APPROXIMATELY, 30 DAYS IT DOUBLED. UNTIL IT REACH  $300.00.AND CONTINOUSLY KEPT GROWING EVENTHOUGH I HAD OBTAINED UNLIMITED SRVICE PLAN. EACH TIME I&#039;D CONTACT THEM ABOUT THE OVERSIZED BILL THEY WOULD STILL FIND SOME WAY TO INFLATE MY MONTHY BILL.I DID BUY THE CELL PHONE FOR DAUGHTER WHO IS A COLLEGE S. WAIT A MINUTE! SHE RECEIVED HONORS AND AWARDS.  SHE LIVES AT HOME. THERE IS NO WAY SHE COULD HAVE THE PHONE ATTACHED TO HER EAR THROUGHOUT HER CLASS TIME. THERE WAS NO BLUETOOTH. 
FINALLY, I REALIZED THAT CHARGES WERE BEING ATTACHED TO MY T-MOBILE CELL PHONE BILL THROUHOUT ALL HER CLASSES EVERYDAY THROUGH THE SEMESTERS AND EVEN WHILE  SHE WAS ASLEEP,  AND WOULD BE GETTING DRESSED  FOR CLASS.   IRONICALLY, THE MOST CONVERSATIONS SHE HAD WAS FAMILY AND WHO HAD SAME PLAN AND WAS NOT SUBJECTED TO THOSE DAILY EXTREME CHARGES.  WHILE SHE WAS SITTING IN CLASS THEY CHARGED HER FOR A CALL TO CHINA  TO A STUDENT WHO WAS SITTING RIGHT NEXT HER.  HELP , PLEASE STOP THE MADNESS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-MOBILE HAS BEEN OVER CHARGING ME FOR MONTHS.  EACH TIME I’D CONTACT THEM ABOUT THE OVERSIZED BILL  T- MOBILE WOULD CONSECUTIVELY  RECOMMEND A NEW PLAN. IT NEVER WORKED. December 24, 2008, MY CELL PHONE BILL BEGAN AT $55.00 @ MONTH .  APPROXIMATELY, 30 DAYS IT DOUBLED. UNTIL IT REACH  $300.00.AND CONTINOUSLY KEPT GROWING EVENTHOUGH I HAD OBTAINED UNLIMITED SRVICE PLAN. EACH TIME I&#8217;D CONTACT THEM ABOUT THE OVERSIZED BILL THEY WOULD STILL FIND SOME WAY TO INFLATE MY MONTHY BILL.I DID BUY THE CELL PHONE FOR DAUGHTER WHO IS A COLLEGE S. WAIT A MINUTE! SHE RECEIVED HONORS AND AWARDS.  SHE LIVES AT HOME. THERE IS NO WAY SHE COULD HAVE THE PHONE ATTACHED TO HER EAR THROUGHOUT HER CLASS TIME. THERE WAS NO BLUETOOTH.<br />
FINALLY, I REALIZED THAT CHARGES WERE BEING ATTACHED TO MY T-MOBILE CELL PHONE BILL THROUHOUT ALL HER CLASSES EVERYDAY THROUGH THE SEMESTERS AND EVEN WHILE  SHE WAS ASLEEP,  AND WOULD BE GETTING DRESSED  FOR CLASS.   IRONICALLY, THE MOST CONVERSATIONS SHE HAD WAS FAMILY AND WHO HAD SAME PLAN AND WAS NOT SUBJECTED TO THOSE DAILY EXTREME CHARGES.  WHILE SHE WAS SITTING IN CLASS THEY CHARGED HER FOR A CALL TO CHINA  TO A STUDENT WHO WAS SITTING RIGHT NEXT HER.  HELP , PLEASE STOP THE MADNESS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unlocked: T-Mobile headed to court over fees, phones &#124; Prepaid Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/t-mobile/t-mobile-faces-class-action-suit-contract-unconscionable-34617/comment-page-1/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>Unlocked: T-Mobile headed to court over fees, phones &#124; Prepaid Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/t-mobile/t-mobile-faces-class-action-suit-contract-unconscionable-34617/#comment-949</guid>
		<description>[...] begins service. However, if you&#8217;ll remember back this summer, that agreement was ruled &#8220;unconscionable and unenforceable&#8221;. Uh oh. Looks like this might be a long winter for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] begins service. However, if you&#8217;ll remember back this summer, that agreement was ruled &#8220;unconscionable and unenforceable&#8221;. Uh oh. Looks like this might be a long winter for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another ruling against mandatory arbitration clauses &#124; Prepaid Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/t-mobile/t-mobile-faces-class-action-suit-contract-unconscionable-34617/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Another ruling against mandatory arbitration clauses &#124; Prepaid Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/t-mobile/t-mobile-faces-class-action-suit-contract-unconscionable-34617/#comment-465</guid>
		<description>[...] last month, a judge ruled that the provision in T-Mobile&#8217;s contract that mandated arbitration was &#8220;unconscionable&#8221; and &#8220;unenforceable.&#8221; Last week, a judge ruled [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last month, a judge ruled that the provision in T-Mobile&#8217;s contract that mandated arbitration was &#8220;unconscionable&#8221; and &#8220;unenforceable.&#8221; Last week, a judge ruled [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another victory in court for cell subscribers &#124; Prepaid Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/t-mobile/t-mobile-faces-class-action-suit-contract-unconscionable-34617/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Another victory in court for cell subscribers &#124; Prepaid Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/t-mobile/t-mobile-faces-class-action-suit-contract-unconscionable-34617/#comment-286</guid>
		<description>[...] appeals hearing that ruled the &#8220;mandatory arbitration&#8221; clause in cell phone contracts &#8220;unconscionable&#8221; and &#8220;unenforceable.&#8221; It was a victory for consumers everywhere, since class action suits win significantly more than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] appeals hearing that ruled the &#8220;mandatory arbitration&#8221; clause in cell phone contracts &#8220;unconscionable&#8221; and &#8220;unenforceable.&#8221; It was a victory for consumers everywhere, since class action suits win significantly more than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

