Blog Categories
- 700 MHz spectrum
- Administrative
- Alltel
- Amp'd Mobile
- AT&T
- Boost Mobile
- Canadian Wireless
- Cell Accessories
- Consumer Cellular
- Consumer Issues
- Cricket
- Helio
- iPhone
- Jitterbug
- kajeet
- Liberty Wireless
- MetroPCS
- Mobile Advertising
- Mobile Data
- Mobile Gaming
- Mobile Safety
- Mobile Video
- MVNO
- Net10
- News
- O2 Wireless
- Page Plus
- Pay-As-You-Go Faceoff
- PlatinumTel
- Prepaid Phones
- Prepaid Podcast
- Prepaid Services
- Prepayd Wireless
- Republic Wireless
- Ringtones
- Simple Mobile
- Sprint
- Straight Talk
- T-Mobile
- Text Messaging
- Ting
- Total Call Mobile
- Tracfone
- U.S. Cellular
- Uncategorized
- Verizon Wireless
- Virgin Mobile
- Voyager Mobile
- Walmart Family Mobile
- Whimsy
Subscribe
Poll
Blogroll
Sprint immediately back in our bad graces
posted by Joe on July 11th, 2007 - 10:00 am | Sprint
First, we were ticked at Sprint for what we thought was heartlessly dropping some of its customers. It was a great bandwagon while it lasted. However, it came to an end recently, as the company satisfactorily justified the move. We’ve had ex-girlfriends call us four or five times a day, so we understand where Sprint is coming from. These problem customers were ruining customer service for everyone else, and in order for Sprint to move forward, they had to make the experience more pleasant for the customers who don’t constantly complain. Now, however, they’re back on our s-list.
In order to further clean out their subscriber base, Sprint dumped a number of customers who were deemed to be roaming far too often. In itself, that’s all fine and good. You know those exorbitant roaming charges you pay? Yeah, well, the company isn’t making much money off that. When you roam, you’re using another company’s network, and your provider has to pay the provider on which you are roaming.
Here’s where the story turns sour. About 200 of these “dropped for excessive roaming” customers were soldiers who had recently returned from Iraq. They were temporarily in West Point, where they were perpetually roaming. According to them, Sprint said that West Point “was in an area of ‘best coverage’.” Maybe it was a “best coverage” area, but that would have to be for another provider.
So now, as they prepare to head back to their regular bases — where Sprint works — they’ve been dropped by Sprint. Worse yet, many of them had just ordered new phones from Sprint, seeing as they’d been in Iraq for a year. And, of course, those phones are locked to Sprint, so the soldiers are SOL.
We expect Sprint will allow these users to continue their service — it would be a terrible PR move not to. However, we would strongly urge them not to. After hearing story after story about their terrible customer service, we’re thinking that Sprint isn’t particularly necessary in the wireless world. Hey, let’s auction off their spectrum and get more open-access airwaves. Wahoo!
[Switched] via [Blogging Stocks]

Related Posts

One Response
-
Sprint CEO: AT&T, Verizon too powerful | Prepaid Reviews Says
[...] have this strange relationship with Sprint. Some things they do piss us off to no end. However, they’re the relative underdog in the telecommunications race, which mitigates them [...]
Posted on October 3rd, 2007 at 9:07 am
Leave a Reply
Main Site
Featured Provider
-
Net 10 PrepaidOur Rating
-
LG500G
Prepaid Phone (NET 10) -
Motorola Red W408g
(NET 10 Prepaid) -
Samsung T401G Prepaid Cell
(NET 10)







