<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Qualcomm still fighting chip ban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/qualcomm-still-fighting-chip-ban-34757/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/qualcomm-still-fighting-chip-ban-34757/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:36:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadcom wins injunction against Qualcomm &#124; Going Cellular</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/qualcomm-still-fighting-chip-ban-34757/comment-page-1/#comment-4178</link>
		<dc:creator>Broadcom wins injunction against Qualcomm &#124; Going Cellular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/qualcomm-still-fighting-chip-ban-34757/#comment-4178</guid>
		<description>[...] put a ban on the importing of these chips. Some thought that the ban was bad for consumers. Still, Qualcomm fought, and in September the ban was temporarily lifted. Well, Qualcomm was hit with a permanent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] put a ban on the importing of these chips. Some thought that the ban was bad for consumers. Still, Qualcomm fought, and in September the ban was temporarily lifted. Well, Qualcomm was hit with a permanent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

