<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Prepaid Reviews Blog &#187; Consumer Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/category/consumer-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:30:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How far should Congress go in stopping prepaid phone traffickers?</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/how-far-should-congress-go-in-stopping-prepaid-phone-traffickers-35909/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/how-far-should-congress-go-in-stopping-prepaid-phone-traffickers-35909/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/?p=2595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One prevalent issue among prepaid cellular providers is of traffickers. We&#8217;ve discussed this at length on Prepaid Reviews, but for a two-sentence re-hash: Many prepaid providers subsidize boxed handsets, like the ones you&#8217;d find at Wal-Mart, so more customers can buy the phones. The companies hope to make the money back when the customer purchases minutes, but that plan is thwarted by traffickers who purchase subsidized handsets in bulk, unlock them, and then sell them at a market rate. Prepaid companies lose big, and so they&#8217;ve helped propose the <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-2449">Wireless Prepaid Access Enforcement Act of 2009</a>. There&#8217;s a lot to it, and <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/10/prepaid-providers-locks-your-phone-hands-pockets">Jennifer Granick of Electronic Frontier Foundation</a> has the analysis.</p>
<p><!--more-->The legislation appears to extend beyond mass traffickers. In other words, while one clause of the legislation would make expressly illegal the purchase of prepaid handsets with the intent to resell or redistribute, another would likely bar any kind of unlocking. Per the bill, it would be illegal for someone who</p>
<blockquote><p>knowingly purchases and/or handles one or more wireless prepaid access devices for the purpose of, or as part of a scheme involving, modifying, removing, avoiding or overwriting installed software which is designed to cause any such device to operate as a wireless prepaid access device on the wireless network or networks for which such device was sold, unless such purchase or handling is authorized by the wireless service provider or device manufacturer</p></blockquote>
<p>That describes the process of unlocking. I understand why carriers would want this. While they&#8217;re not losing tons of money like they are on mass unlockers, they&#8217;re still losing money when someone buys a single handset and then unlocks the phone. For instance, someone can purchase a <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/virginmobile.html">Virgin Mobile</a> phone from Target for far less than retail value. Virgin expects the customer to make up for the phone subsidy by purchasing minutes, but the customer can instantly go flash the phone to <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/metropcs.html">MetroPCS</a>. Virgin is then out the difference between the purchase price and the cost of the phone.</p>
<p>Because the bill would make the act of unlocking a prepaid phone expressly illegal, that would foist the investigation and prosecution costs on government entities (police, FBI, Justice Department). That means a heavier burden on taxpayers. That burden will no longer fall on the shoulders of the prepaid companies. That does seem like one of the less fair aspects of this bill. If companies want to protect their interests, it should be on their dime, not on the taxpayers&#8217;. </p>
<p>It would seem that this bill, then would doubly burden American citizens. It would not only prohibit them from unlocking handsets if they are unhappy with a provider&#8217;s service, but it would also move the costs of prosecuting these newly defined crimes from the companies to the taxpayers. There might be balance somewhere in this issue, but it appears that it will not be found in the current legislative proposal.</p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/how-far-should-congress-go-in-stopping-prepaid-phone-traffickers-35909/">How far should Congress go in stopping prepaid phone traffickers?</a></p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/how-far-should-congress-go-in-stopping-prepaid-phone-traffickers-35909/">How far should Congress go in stopping prepaid phone traffickers?</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/how-far-should-congress-go-in-stopping-prepaid-phone-traffickers-35909/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Refill your prepaid account before the expiration date</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/refill-your-prepaid-account-before-the-expiration-date-35889/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/refill-your-prepaid-account-before-the-expiration-date-35889/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/?p=2543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>User <a href="http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php?p=13081027#post13081027">caki on Howard Forums</a> posts a reminder that we could all use. His <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/att.html">AT&#038;T</a> MediaNet features expired on the 20th of September. So on that morning he went to refill, only to find everything wiped out. AT&#038;T customer service gave him a &#8220;one time&#8221; restore, but was reminded that users must refill <i>before</i> the listed date. So when you see the expiration date on your prepaid wireless account, make sure to top up at least a day before that. Otherwise, your account might get wiped. </p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/refill-your-prepaid-account-before-the-expiration-date-35889/">Refill your prepaid account before the expiration date</a></p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/refill-your-prepaid-account-before-the-expiration-date-35889/">Refill your prepaid account before the expiration date</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/refill-your-prepaid-account-before-the-expiration-date-35889/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to do if a prepaid carrier owes you money</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/what-to-do-if-a-prepaid-carrier-owes-you-money-35876/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/what-to-do-if-a-prepaid-carrier-owes-you-money-35876/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/?p=2514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you look through the user reviews on our <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/bestrated.html">pay as you go cell phone</a> providers, you might notice a theme of discontent. The reviews are usually well balanced between positive and negative in general, but there is a specific type of negative comment I&#8217;ve seen a lot of lately. Some people claim that a prepaid carrier owes them money for one reason or another &#8212; minutes balance not transferring is the No. 1 complaint, specifically. If you think you&#8217;ve ben wronged by a prepaid carrier and that they owe you money, you can send your dispute to the FCC. It&#8217;s a much better and responsive process than the Better Business Bureau.</p>
<p><!--more-->To file your complaint, go to the <a href="http://esupport.fcc.gov/complaints.htm">FCC Consumer Complaints page</a>. There you&#8217;ll select the wireless phone option. The billing, service, privacy, number portability and other issues option is probably what you&#8217;re looking for here, but this is a clearinghouse for all types of complaints. </p>
<p>The final step is to decide how to file your complaint. The easiest way is an online form, which you can access after you choose your complaint category. Just fill out the information and hit Submit. Otherwise, you can file by phone by calling 1-888-CALL-FCC (225-5322), or snail mail or fax the form, which you can print out from the website.</p>
<p>Again, this is a bit more efficient a process than complaining to the BBB. I&#8217;ve rarely seen anything come of a BBB complaint, but I&#8217;ve had many a friend get a response from an FCC complaint.</p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/what-to-do-if-a-prepaid-carrier-owes-you-money-35876/">What to do if a prepaid carrier owes you money</a></p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/what-to-do-if-a-prepaid-carrier-owes-you-money-35876/">What to do if a prepaid carrier owes you money</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/what-to-do-if-a-prepaid-carrier-owes-you-money-35876/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer Reports says prepaid has better deals</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/consumer-reports-says-prepaid-has-better-deals-35871/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/consumer-reports-says-prepaid-has-better-deals-35871/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/?p=2503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/tmobile.html">T-Mobile</a> currently has a promotion running, Mobile Makeover, which alleges to find you the best deal on a mobile service plan, based on your needs, regardless of carrier. It&#8217;s supposed to be them playing the good guys, turning away customers if they can find better deals elsewhere, rather than trying to make the sale at all costs. For the service they partner with <a href="http://www.billshrink.com">BillShrink.com</a>, a site which compares cellular plans across carriers. The only problem is that BillShrink only compares major carriers. <a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/money/2009/09/t-mobile-tmobile-misleading-makeover-pitch-billshrink-prepaid-telephone-service-att-sprint-verizon-w.html">Consumer Reports</a> tackles the issue, noting that oftentimes prepaid carriers have cheaper plans than their postpaid counterparts.</p>
<p><!--more-->From the Consumer Reports blog post:</p>
<blockquote><p>Conspicuously missing are four national prepaid carriers—<a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/boostmobile.html">Boost Mobile</a>, <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">Net10</a>, <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/tracfone.html">Tracfone</a>, and <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/virginmobile.html">Virgin Mobile</a>—which together serve some 22 million price-conscious U.S. customers. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s an important omission, because we found that Boost and Virgin typically had the lowest-priced deals when we compared 152 national plans, as we reported in the September issue of Consumer Reports in &#8220;<a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine-archive/september-2009/electronics-computers/cell-phone-service/overview/cell-phone-service-ov.htm?INTKEY=195BME0">Prepaid pays off</a>.&#8221; We searched through national plans offered by eight big contract and prepaid carriers for a range of sample cellular consumers using various amounts of voice, text messaging, and mobile Internet services. Prepaid plans from Boost or Virgin were the least expensive in nine of 11 comparisons.  </p></blockquote>
<p>The only two which Boost or Virgin didn&#8217;t lead were for family plans, long the strong suit of the major carriers. Other than that, it&#8217;s prepaid on top. </p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/consumer-reports-says-prepaid-has-better-deals-35871/">Consumer Reports says prepaid has better deals</a></p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/consumer-reports-says-prepaid-has-better-deals-35871/">Consumer Reports says prepaid has better deals</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/consumer-reports-says-prepaid-has-better-deals-35871/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t expect (legal) telemarketing calls on your cell phone</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/dont-expect-legal-telemarketing-calls-on-your-cell-phone-35870/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/dont-expect-legal-telemarketing-calls-on-your-cell-phone-35870/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/?p=2501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="https://www.donotcall.gov">National Do Not Call Registry</a> has saved many a headache for regular Joes. Opened in 2003, it allows consumers to enter their number on a registry which will preclude it from telemarketing autodialers. People can register their cell phones, but under federal regulation they need not: &#8220;FCC regulations prohibit telemarketers from using automated dialers to call cell phone numbers.&#8221; There have been rumors lately which suggest a reversal of this policy, much to the chagrin of almost everyone outside the telemarketing industry. Thankfully, the rumor appears to be bunk. The FCC has <a href="http://www.cellular-news.com/story/39668.php?source=rss">put it to rest</a>, assuring citizens that the law will not allow autodialers to call their cell phones. This leaves only the rogues to deal with.</p>
<p><!--more-->The only problem left, then, is the consortium of rogue operations which continue to autodial cell phones. We&#8217;ve seen a number of telecom companies <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/verizon-wireless/verizon-sticks-it-to-another-group-of-rogue-telemarketers-34574/">crack down on this practice</a>. The fight even continues today, with those <a href="http://goingcellular.com/verizon-wireless/verizon-files-suit-against-car-warranty-telemarketers-44686/">pesky car warranty autodialers</a>.</p>
<p>Now, if I could just get my bank to stop calling me offering me a high-interest savings account if I deposit $25,000.</p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/dont-expect-legal-telemarketing-calls-on-your-cell-phone-35870/">Don&#8217;t expect (legal) telemarketing calls on your cell phone</a></p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/dont-expect-legal-telemarketing-calls-on-your-cell-phone-35870/">Don&#8217;t expect (legal) telemarketing calls on your cell phone</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/dont-expect-legal-telemarketing-calls-on-your-cell-phone-35870/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could a surtax be headed for your prepaid calling card?</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/could-a-surtax-be-headed-for-your-prepaid-calling-card-35807/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/could-a-surtax-be-headed-for-your-prepaid-calling-card-35807/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/?p=2208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One question which has plagued prepaid wireless recently is of what to do with 911. Not just the service &#8212; though we&#8217;ve heard a few instances where 911 didn&#8217;t work from a prepaid phone &#8212; but of how to pay the tax. Postpaid cellular users pay a monthly 911 fee to cover operational costs. So why don&#8217;t prepaid users? Because there&#8217;s no easy way to implement it. There is no monthly bill, so there&#8217;s no chance to add on the charge. Still, a solution might be on the way. Jeff Robertson of the 911 Industry Alliance says that <a href="http://urgentcomm.com/policy_and_law/news/prepaid-wireless-fees-20090709/">point of sale charges may be the way to go</a>. Of course, he&#8217;s facing significant opposition.</p>
<p><!--more-->Mark Barfield, a VP at Radio Shack, has his doubts about the plan:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There are tens of thousands of mom-and-pop stores that sell these things and many won’t comply. Small businesses will think that no one will catch them if they don&#8217;t charge the fee.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>That is certainly a concern. So while Robertson says that a &#8220;point-of-sale model is the best way to go,&#8221; it might not be true. If there&#8217;s no way to enforce it, after all, what good will it do?</p>
<p>Perhaps one way to accomplish this is to force carriers to charge users a fee every 30 days, right from their account balance. Some people have odd prepaid phone usage behaviors, so carriers couldn&#8217;t charge it on the same date every month. Instead, they&#8217;d have to charge it for every 30 active days of use. That would require a new system, though, which could render the idea moot.</p>
<p>Will they go with a POS system? It looks like this is the case. If you&#8217;re going to be charged for 911 services, would you rather it be done when you buy top-up cards (presumably this would work with Internet sales as well)? Or would you rather it be deducted from your account balance? </p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/could-a-surtax-be-headed-for-your-prepaid-calling-card-35807/">Could a surtax be headed for your prepaid calling card?</a></p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/could-a-surtax-be-headed-for-your-prepaid-calling-card-35807/">Could a surtax be headed for your prepaid calling card?</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/could-a-surtax-be-headed-for-your-prepaid-calling-card-35807/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will VoIP spell the end of prepaid?</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/will-voip-spell-the-end-of-prepaid-35716/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/will-voip-spell-the-end-of-prepaid-35716/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/?p=1951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been hearing a lot about the growth of prepaid wireless lately. Whether it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/t-mobile/t-mobile-again-adds-more-prepaid-than-postpaid-35632/">T-Mobile adding more prepaid customers than postpaid</a> or <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/metropcs/metropcs-hits-the-jackpot-in-q1-with-684000-subscribers-35703/">MetroPCS adding hordes of subscribers</a>, it seems to be at the forefront of the cellular conversation. How long will it stay there? Some think it&#8217;s here to stay &#8212; that customers will in the long run prefer not to have a contract. Others, though, think emerging technologies, like mobile Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), will <a href="http://www.glgroup.com/News/Voice-is-Becoming-Increasingly-Commmoditized--Prepaid-will-Become-a-Credit-Impaired-only-Service-37777.html">marginalize prepaid service</a>.</p>
<p><!--more-->VoIP, as we know, can provide low-cost or even no-cost calling. This is going to attract many customers, and the analysis&#8217;s author believe that it will be at the expense of prepaid. As he says:</p>
<blockquote><p>within 18-30 months the pressure will be on carriers to position &#8220;carrier voice&#8221; as a premium convenience &#8220;dialable&#8221; service as compared to free VoIP services.  As this evolution begins to take hold, prepaid services will begin to look less attractive versus a low-cost post-paid plan with data.</p></blockquote>
<p>Under that scenario, prepaid would return to being a haven for the credit-challenged. While it&#8217;s almost impossible to accurately predict how VoIP will change wireless, it&#8217;s safe to say that prepaid will still have its niche. After all, as the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iNAaUjbjXb0uJLpxTbHB9X4uq3tgD97MB4QG5">AP notes</a>, prepaid is growing extraordinarily. In fact, we should see more prepaid customers added this year than postpaid customers. </p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/will-voip-spell-the-end-of-prepaid-35716/">Will VoIP spell the end of prepaid?</a></p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/will-voip-spell-the-end-of-prepaid-35716/">Will VoIP spell the end of prepaid?</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/will-voip-spell-the-end-of-prepaid-35716/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: $3 per minute average for cell phone users</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/study-3-per-minute-average-for-cell-phone-users-35712/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/study-3-per-minute-average-for-cell-phone-users-35712/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/?p=1942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When a survey makes a radical claim, it&#8217;s best to take it with a grain of salt. Case in point: after we found a survey which claimed that <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/americans-cutting-cell-costs-plan-to-reduce-further-35686/">17 percent of cell users switched from postpaid to prepaid</a>, said survey&#8217;s methodologies were <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/are-people-really-switching-to-prepaid-35691/">subsequently questioned</a>. So when a new survey says that <a href="http://www.ketv.com/money/19175229/detail.html">cell phone users are paying an average of $3 per minute</a>, I&#8217;m quite skeptical. It means that a lot of people aren&#8217;t using close to all the voice minutes on their plan.</p>
<p><!--more-->Take the basic Verizon postpaid package for instance, which provides 450 minutes for $40 per month. To get to $3 per minute, you&#8217;d need to talk just 13 minutes during the month. Chances are, though, that people are paying for more expensive plans and then using a lesser proportion of the minutes. Still, the above example shows how difficult it is to get to $3 per minute.</p>
<p>This data seems skewed, and in all likelihood it is. If the average is $3 per minute, then there are people bringing up that average. If it&#8217;s so hard to get to $3 per minute, think about how few minutes you&#8217;d have to use and how much money you&#8217;d have to spend to get to $4 per minute. While many postpaid customers pay more per minute than prepaid customers, it&#8217;s likely not this drastic.</p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/study-3-per-minute-average-for-cell-phone-users-35712/">Study: $3 per minute average for cell phone users</a></p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/study-3-per-minute-average-for-cell-phone-users-35712/">Study: $3 per minute average for cell phone users</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/study-3-per-minute-average-for-cell-phone-users-35712/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio story shows why e911 is important</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/ohio-story-shows-why-e911-is-important-35708/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/ohio-story-shows-why-e911-is-important-35708/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/?p=1933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For years the FCC has been trying to get cellular carriers to become e911 compliant. With a larger and larger percentage of emergency calls coming from cell phones, it&#8217;s important that the call get routed to the proper 911 center, and that the first responders can locate the phone using cell towers. We saw an <a href="http://www.whiotv.com/news/19131998/detail.html">example of this</a> in Ohio last week, after a Miamisburg man&#8217;s house and business caught fire. He called 911, which routed him to the local police department, which wasn&#8217;t open and which had a recording prompting people to call 911 for emergencies. Clearly, this is not the best way to operate an emergency service. Had the man&#8217;s phone been 911 compliant, help would have gotten to him before his &#8220;home was fully engulfed and a near total loss.&#8221;</p>
<p><!--more-->The man&#8217;s phone was through <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/cricket.html">Cricket wireless</a>, so they were immediately blamed for the incident. Sheriff&#8217;s deputies tested 911 calls throughout the county and came across the same problem throughout. A subsequent report noted that <a href="http://www.daytondailynews.com/news/dayton-news/cricket-911-calls-operating-normally-company-says-76811.html">Cricket is in the process of fixing the problem</a>, which they note was isolated.</p>
<p>This story perfectly displays why e911 services are so important. We&#8217;ve been programmed since a young age to call 911 for emergencies, and the victim did just that. Only with full e911 compliance can we ensure that calls get routed to the proper centers, and that first responders get the information they need.</p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/ohio-story-shows-why-e911-is-important-35708/">Ohio story shows why e911 is important</a></p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/ohio-story-shows-why-e911-is-important-35708/">Ohio story shows why e911 is important</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/ohio-story-shows-why-e911-is-important-35708/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are people really switching to prepaid?</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/are-people-really-switching-to-prepaid-35691/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/are-people-really-switching-to-prepaid-35691/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/?p=1891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent survey, which we discussed Monday, found that <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/americans-cutting-cell-costs-plan-to-reduce-further-35686/">many Americans are switching to prepaid services</a> from their postpaid deals. Specifically, they found that 17 percent of contract cell phone users have switched to prepaid within the past six month. That seems like a pretty significant number, so it came as a surprise to see <a href="http://www.glgroup.com/News/No-Huge-Shift-to-Prepaid-Wireless-Foreseen-due-to-the-Recession-36232.html">this headline</a> come up in an alert: No Huge Shift to Prepaid Wireless Foresen due to the Recession. Hm. What could he mean by that, in the face of the data presented?</p>
<p><!--more-->It would have helped had I found this first: the author, Samual Greenholtz, <a href="http://www.glgroup.com/News/Poll-on-Wireless-Users-Cannot-be-Taken-Seriously-36187.html">published another article</a> on the same day, refuting the findings of the New Millennium Research Council. Specifically, he questioned their methodology in extrapolating numbers. So perhaps 17 percent of postpaid users have not, in fact, switched to prepaid.</p>
<p>Per Greenholtz:</p>
<blockquote><p>While possible that some people may switch from post-paid to <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/compare/">prepaid plans</a> as a means of saving money due to additional fees for the former, it is not likely that there will be a big shift.  The rationale is that the wireless carriers are getting smarter about how to price to consumers so that its more of a hassle to switch to prepaid than itâ€™s worth.  </p></blockquote>
<p>Is this true, though? Has there been any indication that wireless carriers are improving postpaid plans? Perhaps Sprint, with their all-inclusive Simply Everything plan, but even then it is geared towards the high-end user. When was the last time the lowest-end offering ($40 per month for 450 minutes on Verizon and others) has improved? These are the customers that wireless carriers risk losing to prepaid. </p>
<p>If carriers do improve their low-end offerings, then perhaps Greenholtz&#8217;s analysis will hold true. However, with few noticeable changes recently, and having heard no rumors of such changes, it seems doubtful that this will ring true. Customers will continue to switch to prepaid. At this point, would it be a surprise to see the total prepaid subscribers jump to 20 percent after the first quarter?</p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/are-people-really-switching-to-prepaid-35691/">Are people really switching to prepaid?</a></p>
<p>This post originated at <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com">PrepaidReviews.com</a> - The number one resource for <a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/net10.html">NET 10 Prepaid</a> information on the web!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/are-people-really-switching-to-prepaid-35691/">Are people really switching to prepaid?</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/consumer-issues/are-people-really-switching-to-prepaid-35691/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
