<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The two sides of AT&amp;T</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/the-two-sides-of-att-34870/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/the-two-sides-of-att-34870/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:05:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Class action against AT&#38;T may move forward &#124; Going Cellular</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/the-two-sides-of-att-34870/comment-page-1/#comment-5924</link>
		<dc:creator>Class action against AT&#38;T may move forward &#124; Going Cellular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/the-two-sides-of-att-34870/#comment-5924</guid>
		<description>[...] made the network not function optimally. This, they say, was a ploy to get people to switch to AT&amp;T&#8217;s blue network, which meant paying an $18 upgrade fee. And if you wanted to get out of your contract, well, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made the network not function optimally. This, they say, was a ploy to get people to switch to AT&#38;T&#8217;s blue network, which meant paying an $18 upgrade fee. And if you wanted to get out of your contract, well, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
