<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T files heavy-hitting answer to NASCAR appeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/att-files-heavy-hitting-answer-to-nascar-appeal-34591/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/att-files-heavy-hitting-answer-to-nascar-appeal-34591/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The AT&#38;T/NASCAR saga continues: NASCAR files response &#124; Prepaid Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/att-files-heavy-hitting-answer-to-nascar-appeal-34591/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>The AT&#38;T/NASCAR saga continues: NASCAR files response &#124; Prepaid Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/att-files-heavy-hitting-answer-to-nascar-appeal/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>[...] a few days late with this one &#8212; apologies. Earlier this week, AT&amp;T filed their answer to NASCAR&#8217;s appeal of an injunction that allowed AT&amp;T to rebrand the No. 31 Cingular [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a few days late with this one &#8212; apologies. Earlier this week, AT&#38;T filed their answer to NASCAR&#8217;s appeal of an injunction that allowed AT&#38;T to rebrand the No. 31 Cingular [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

