Blog Categories
- 700 MHz spectrum
- Administrative
- Alltel
- Amp'd Mobile
- AT&T
- Boost Mobile
- Canadian Wireless
- Cell Accessories
- Consumer Cellular
- Consumer Issues
- Cricket
- Helio
- iPhone
- Jitterbug
- kajeet
- Liberty Wireless
- MetroPCS
- Mobile Advertising
- Mobile Data
- Mobile Gaming
- Mobile Safety
- Mobile Video
- MVNO
- Net10
- News
- O2 Wireless
- Page Plus
- Pay-As-You-Go Faceoff
- PlatinumTel
- Prepaid Phones
- Prepaid Podcast
- Prepaid Services
- Prepayd Wireless
- Republic Wireless
- Ringtones
- Simple Mobile
- Sprint
- Straight Talk
- T-Mobile
- Text Messaging
- Total Call Mobile
- Tracfone
- U.S. Cellular
- Verizon Wireless
- Virgin Mobile
- Walmart Family Mobile
- Whimsy
Subscribe
Poll
Blogroll
AT&T/Cingular merger causes customer issues
posted by Stuart on July 12th, 2007 - 10:00 am | AT&T, Consumer Issues
We hate the local news. Anyone else? It’s always the same kinda things: tragic leads, followed by some local snips mixed in with human interest stories. And when the show’s over, you haven’t learned much. The one aspect we do like, however, is when they do “shame on you” segments. They often expose companies and individuals who truly need to be shut down, and boy, are they ruthless in doing it. It’s the one ratings grabber that actually makes sense. We were especially pleased to see an ABC report out of Philadelphia about a woman who’s cell bill grew exponentially after the AT&T/Cingular merger.
The woman in question, Constance Griffin, was fine with Cingular. She had a good $50 rate plan, and never went over her minutes. However, once AT&T entered the fray, she found herself consistently over the plan — to the tune of $470.
AT&T initially denied any fault, saying it had nothing to do with the merger. What was it, then? Oh, that’s right: AT&T always wants you to “upgrade” your plan. By that, of course, they mean they want you to pay more for services you don’t need.
We don’t understand how AT&T could have let this happen. This is supposed to be a “valued” customer. And this is no small issue, either. So instead of taking action immediately, AT&T says “tough luck” and laughs as they stuff their pockets with more 100-dollar bills.
It’s sad that the issue was only involved when a major media outlet got involved. Afraid of the PR nightmare that could stem from this, AT&T waived Constance’s $470 bill and changed per plan so that she’s still paying her $50 per month.
A nice outcome, yes, but what about all the victims that haven’t gone to TV stations with the problem?

Related Posts

3 Responses
-
Cell phone contracts don’t hold up…again | Prepaid Reviews Says
[...] widely reported case of AT&T trying to screw over consumers. Oh yeah, there was something just yesterday on that, wasn’t [...]
Posted on July 13th, 2007 at 11:19 am -
Cher Says
I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT THEY SAY THEY WON’T BE CHARGING YOU FOR DATA TRANSFER FROM YOUR PC TO YOUR PHONE. ONLY IF YOU DOWNLOAD DIRECTLY FROM THE INTERNET AND THEN THEY TURN AROUND AND BILL YOU FOR YOUR DOWNLOADING FROM YOUR PC AND SAY SORRY IT IS ALL DATA TRANSFER. WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSE HOCKY..
Posted on September 1st, 2007 at 12:06 pm -
Detroit Says
We are what we repeatedly do.
Posted on May 22nd, 2008 at 9:46 pm










