http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/another-ruling-against-mandatory-arbitration-clauses-34773/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:13:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/another-ruling-against-mandatory-arbitration-clauses-34773/comment-page-1/#comment-509 Cause and effect: Suing your wireless carrier | Prepaid Reviews Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:34:19 +0000 http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/another-ruling-against-mandatory-arbitration-clauses-34773/#comment-509 [...] behind, a 9th Circuit judge ruled last week that the clause in AT&T’s contract that bars class action suits is unenforceable. This comes a month or so after the same ruling was made against T-Mobile. [...] [...] behind, a 9th Circuit judge ruled last week that the clause in AT&T’s contract that bars class action suits is unenforceable. This comes a month or so after the same ruling was made against T-Mobile. [...]

]]> http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/another-ruling-against-mandatory-arbitration-clauses-34773/comment-page-1/#comment-488 A surefire way to avoid an early termination fee | Prepaid Reviews Wed, 22 Aug 2007 14:02:26 +0000 http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/another-ruling-against-mandatory-arbitration-clauses-34773/#comment-488 [...] though, is a good thing for the slow elimination of unfair contracts. We’re already seeing mandatory arbitration clauses being struck down. Now let’s get greedy and work for [...] [...] though, is a good thing for the slow elimination of unfair contracts. We’re already seeing mandatory arbitration clauses being struck down. Now let’s get greedy and work for [...]

]]> http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/another-ruling-against-mandatory-arbitration-clauses-34773/comment-page-1/#comment-475 AT&T sued over poor service | Prepaid Reviews Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:00:24 +0000 http://www.prepaidreviews.com/blog/att-go-phone/another-ruling-against-mandatory-arbitration-clauses-34773/#comment-475 [...] in California ruled that the provision in AT&T’s contract that bars class action suits was unconscionable, and that such a case could proceed against them. Today, we bring you the case. It seems that some [...] [...] in California ruled that the provision in AT&T’s contract that bars class action suits was unconscionable, and that such a case could proceed against them. Today, we bring you the case. It seems that some [...]

]]>